|
CASE 1
THORNE V SILVERLEAF
Liability for debts under the Insolvency
Act 1986, sections 216 and 217.
FACTS
1. Thorne was a director of three companies
over a period of 25 years:
a. Mike Spence (reading) Limited
b. Mike Spence (Motorsport) Limited
c. Mike Spence Classic Cars Limited
2. the first two of these three companies
had previously gone into liquidation with T as a director.
The third company was then formed and substantial monies procured
from S under an oral joint venture agreement.
3. S began to take a closer interest
in the running of the company, attending 9 or 10 monthly meetings.
4. On default of the agreement, S demanded
the drawing up of an accountants report on the company which
put T's indebtedness to S at £135,000. S obtained summary
judgement against the company and T personally under Sections
216 and 217 of the Insolvency Act 1986.
HELD
1. The name of the company was so similar
to the previous two as to make it a prohibited name under
Section 216 (2).
2. As T was a director of the first two
companies in the 12 months preceeding their liquidation and
went on within five years of their liquidation to be a director
in a company with a prohibited name, he was liable to criminal
sanctions under Section 216 (4).
3. T as a person involved in the management
of a third company was jointly and severally liable for its
liabilities incurred at the time of his involvement, along
with the company and any other persons liable (Section 217).
4. Although the sections go further than
is required to curb the 'Pheonix Syndrome' the court has no
discretion to withhold their application.
5. T's argument that S is aiding and
abetting the vrime should be precluded by public policy from
profiting from his own wrong, was rejected for three reasons:-
5.1 Public policy will not automatically
intervene in every crime or wrong committed by a person.
5.2 S had not profited as he was entitled
to the debt in any event.
5.3 In any event, S had not, in the view
of the Court, aided and abetted as he had only participated
in the management of the company to the extent that many institutional
lenders would to monitor a loan.
|