guidance to liquidators
  period of disqualification
  effect of disqualification
  carecraft orders
  costs
  insolvency act 2000
  statistics
  law library
       

Re: C U Fittings 1989

Hindsight

Experienced judges have expressed an appreciation of the difficulties of making decisions in the "heat of battle" in various ways. Thus, Hoffmann J in Re: C U Fittings 1989 (BCLC) 556 (at 559d):

"It may be that in January, or even earlier, a dispassionate mind would have reached the conclusion that the company was doomed. But directors immersed in the day to day task of trying to keep their businesses afloat cannot be expected to have wholly dispassionate minds. They tend to cling to hope.

Obviously there comes a point at which an honest businessman recognises that he is only gambling at the expense of his creditors on the possibility that something may turn up. But this is not such a case."

There are numerous other examples (Re: Bath Glass Ltd (1988), Re: Dawson Print Ltd (1987), Re: McNultys Interchange Ltd (1989) and Re: Cladrose (1990)). Directors are not disqualified for failing to have a crystal ball or for failing to take a week off to consider their position.