guidance to liquidators
  period of disqualification
  effect of disqualification
  carecraft orders
  costs
  insolvency act 2000
  statistics
  law library
       

Re: Hickling

Duty of Fairness

It is well settled that, in presenting the evidence in support of an application for a disqualification order, the applicant has a duty to be fair. This has been summarised in one of the cases as follows:

"At this stage I want to say a little about the applicants duties. It is accepted that these are not adversarial proceedings but have an element of public interest any may entail penal consequences. It follows that there is a duty on the applicant to present the case against each respondent fairly. Many of these applications go by default or are defended by litigations in person, and the practice is for an official in the Department of Trade and Industry to swear a short affidavit referring to charges, specified in a detailed affidavit sworn by the receiver or liquidator.

In my judgement that second affidavit should not omit significant available evidence in favour of any respondent. It should attempt to deal with any explanation already proffered by any of the respondents. It should endeavour to apportion responsibility as between the respondents and it should avoid sweeping statements. I do not know who drafted the receivers affidavit in the present case, but it does seem to me to fall down on all four counts."

(SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRADE AND INDUSTRY -V- HICKLING (1996) BCC 678 AT 690 B-D)