|
You will be pleased to note that
an administrators "costs" are controlled in several
ways.
- Firstly the administrator is
obliged by law to put forward a "proposal" for
achieving the "purpose" of the administration.
That proposal document must be sent to every creditor with
an invitation to attend a creditors meeting to discuss the
"proposal". The proposal document itself must
set a basis upon which it is proposed that the administrators
remuneration should be fixed.
- When the creditors review
the proposal they can modify what the administrator
requests in relation to his fees by voting at the creditors
meeting. The vote would be to resolve to change the
basis on which the administrators fees are to be calculated.
- In addition if such a
creditors resolution to approve the basis of the administrators
fees has been approved the administrator has a further
hurdle to jump in cases where the realisations made
are insufficient to make a payment to unsecured creditors.
In such cases the secured creditors have to approve
the fees (as it is they who are effectively paying
the administrator).
- But if there are enough
funds to pay secured creditors in full then the
effect is that the administration costs fall on
the preferential creditors. If this circumstance
arises the preferential creditors vote on the administrators
remuneration package.
The effect of all these
rules is that the party who directly suffers the costs
of the administration is also the party who decides
on the administration remuneration.
"He who pays the Piper
picks the tune."
or
"He who pays the administrator
picks the remuneration package."
|